<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Estimate:  Google Pulls in $200 Million from &#8216;Local&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://localonliner.com/2006/07/20/google-pulls-in-200-million-from-local-maybe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://localonliner.com/2006/07/20/google-pulls-in-200-million-from-local-maybe/</link>
	<description>Peter Krasilovsky&#039;s</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:44:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Burnes</title>
		<link>http://localonliner.com/2006/07/20/google-pulls-in-200-million-from-local-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-3851</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Burnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localonliner.com/?p=148#comment-3851</guid>
		<description>Also worth noting this &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2006/07/google_properties_updated.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hitwise&lt;/a&gt; post. They say Google local domains represent .03% of Google traffic. 

If all the numbers we have are correct, Google is doing a lot of geotargeting outside their local domains, or those local domains are very, very lucrative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also worth noting this <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2006/07/google_properties_updated.html" rel="nofollow">Hitwise</a> post. They say Google local domains represent .03% of Google traffic. </p>
<p>If all the numbers we have are correct, Google is doing a lot of geotargeting outside their local domains, or those local domains are very, very lucrative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 Yellow Pages &#187; Yellow Pages in a Web 2.0 Context</title>
		<link>http://localonliner.com/2006/07/20/google-pulls-in-200-million-from-local-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-3849</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 Yellow Pages &#187; Yellow Pages in a Web 2.0 Context</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localonliner.com/?p=148#comment-3849</guid>
		<description>[...] In the Web 2.0 world the Yellow Pages industry has had to try to adapt by adding integrated features to make relevant online searching, at the same time as search companies have tread on their world by rolling out local offerings.&#160; If the stats quoted by the Local Onliner are accurate then they should be very, very worried. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the Web 2.0 world the Yellow Pages industry has had to try to adapt by adding integrated features to make relevant online searching, at the same time as search companies have tread on their world by rolling out local offerings.&nbsp; If the stats quoted by the Local Onliner are accurate then they should be very, very worried. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

