<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The MapQuest Survey of Online Mapping Demand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://localonliner.com/2007/05/30/mapquest-low-usage-good-interest-in-3d-maps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://localonliner.com/2007/05/30/mapquest-low-usage-good-interest-in-3d-maps/</link>
	<description>Peter Krasilovsky&#039;s</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:44:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: evans ink &#187; Blog Archive &#187; could Superman help me shop locally?</title>
		<link>http://localonliner.com/2007/05/30/mapquest-low-usage-good-interest-in-3d-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-63148</link>
		<dc:creator>evans ink &#187; Blog Archive &#187; could Superman help me shop locally?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 12:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localonliner.com/?p=393#comment-63148</guid>
		<description>[...] The proceedings of Where 2.0 are being covered well in local blogs by Kelsey and SEL affiliate bloggers Krasilovsky and Sterling. The juxtaposition of MapQuest v. Google &amp; MS at this event warrants commentary. As Google announced the latest volley in the dimensional geo war v. Microsoft, MapQuest tried to pour cold water on the lovefest by highlighting how far removed these innovations still are from everyday life, and how the &#8220;real demand&#8221; is for personalization not &#8220;dimension&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The proceedings of Where 2.0 are being covered well in local blogs by Kelsey and SEL affiliate bloggers Krasilovsky and Sterling. The juxtaposition of MapQuest v. Google &#38; MS at this event warrants commentary. As Google announced the latest volley in the dimensional geo war v. Microsoft, MapQuest tried to pour cold water on the lovefest by highlighting how far removed these innovations still are from everyday life, and how the &#8220;real demand&#8221; is for personalization not &#8220;dimension&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More from Where 2.0 at Ghost of Midnight</title>
		<link>http://localonliner.com/2007/05/30/mapquest-low-usage-good-interest-in-3d-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-63040</link>
		<dc:creator>More from Where 2.0 at Ghost of Midnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 16:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localonliner.com/?p=393#comment-63040</guid>
		<description>[...] The Local Onliner reports today from the Where 2.0 conference about online mapping.  A couple points of interest&#8230; MapQuest Gm James Greiner brought everything back to Earth with a survey showing that just 42 percent of Internet users use mapping sites, and relatively light penetration of advanced mapping services&#8230; just 22 percent want to post a map publicly (i.e. on a blog or Website).  The survey found that while advanced imagery (i.e. 3D maps) is considered interesting, with 47 percent planning to use it, just 18 percent currently do.  The demand for personalized features may be hotter than advanced imagery, with interest jumping from 49 percent to 68 percent when examples of usage were provided. The survey also found that 75 percent want to save addresses; 55 percent want to share with family and friends; 59 percent want Points of Interest on maps’ 50 percent want to increase the presence of storefronts on maps; and 50 percent want the ability to search select vendors and/or services. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Local Onliner reports today from the Where 2.0 conference about online mapping.  A couple points of interest&#8230; MapQuest Gm James Greiner brought everything back to Earth with a survey showing that just 42 percent of Internet users use mapping sites, and relatively light penetration of advanced mapping services&#8230; just 22 percent want to post a map publicly (i.e. on a blog or Website).  The survey found that while advanced imagery (i.e. 3D maps) is considered interesting, with 47 percent planning to use it, just 18 percent currently do.  The demand for personalized features may be hotter than advanced imagery, with interest jumping from 49 percent to 68 percent when examples of usage were provided. The survey also found that 75 percent want to save addresses; 55 percent want to share with family and friends; 59 percent want Points of Interest on maps’ 50 percent want to increase the presence of storefronts on maps; and 50 percent want the ability to search select vendors and/or services. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

