<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Potts Does a ‘Final Word’ on Backfence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://localonliner.com/2007/07/16/potts-does-a-%e2%80%98final-word%e2%80%99-on-backfence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://localonliner.com/2007/07/16/potts-does-a-%e2%80%98final-word%e2%80%99-on-backfence/</link>
	<description>Peter Krasilovsky&#039;s</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:01:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-07-23 at Framtider.net</title>
		<link>http://localonliner.com/2007/07/16/potts-does-a-%e2%80%98final-word%e2%80%99-on-backfence/comment-page-1/#comment-68812</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-07-23 at Framtider.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localonliner.com/?p=430#comment-68812</guid>
		<description>[...] The Local Onliner » Potts Does a ‘Final Word’ on Backfence (tags: toread) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Local Onliner » Potts Does a ‘Final Word’ on Backfence (tags: toread) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zippy</title>
		<link>http://localonliner.com/2007/07/16/potts-does-a-%e2%80%98final-word%e2%80%99-on-backfence/comment-page-1/#comment-68168</link>
		<dc:creator>zippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localonliner.com/?p=430#comment-68168</guid>
		<description>They only sold 400 ads in 13 different communities??? This is something to be proud of?

I first read this three months ago, and my jaw dropped. They won&#039;t tell us how much they sold the ads for, or if they even had any long-term, repeat advertisers, but let&#039;s be very generous and say they sold their 400 ads at $1,000/year.  BackFence&#039;s annual gross revenue was $400,000 before costs – and this from 13 entirely different properties, all with separate editorial costs, management, etc, etc. – after three years in business? 

No need for tortuous academic analyses here, this is just lousy execution, plain and simple. 

And from this debacle, we&#039;re now supposed to learn something about &quot;the importance of meaningful engagement at the local level.&quot;  If by that he means &quot;selling ads to local businesses&quot;, well, yes, that is pretty vital.

Hit the streets, Mr. Potts, pound the pavement, smile and dial, sell something, bring some money in the door – and then go out and do it again tomorrow, and the day after that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They only sold 400 ads in 13 different communities??? This is something to be proud of?</p>
<p>I first read this three months ago, and my jaw dropped. They won&#8217;t tell us how much they sold the ads for, or if they even had any long-term, repeat advertisers, but let&#8217;s be very generous and say they sold their 400 ads at $1,000/year.  BackFence&#8217;s annual gross revenue was $400,000 before costs – and this from 13 entirely different properties, all with separate editorial costs, management, etc, etc. – after three years in business? </p>
<p>No need for tortuous academic analyses here, this is just lousy execution, plain and simple. </p>
<p>And from this debacle, we&#8217;re now supposed to learn something about &#8220;the importance of meaningful engagement at the local level.&#8221;  If by that he means &#8220;selling ads to local businesses&#8221;, well, yes, that is pretty vital.</p>
<p>Hit the streets, Mr. Potts, pound the pavement, smile and dial, sell something, bring some money in the door – and then go out and do it again tomorrow, and the day after that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McCormack</title>
		<link>http://localonliner.com/2007/07/16/potts-does-a-%e2%80%98final-word%e2%80%99-on-backfence/comment-page-1/#comment-68105</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McCormack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localonliner.com/?p=430#comment-68105</guid>
		<description>Thx for calling this to my attention.  

No different that the 90&#039;s, when you could be anything in PowerPoint, today, you can be anything in a Web Site (community site or otherwise).   However, if you can&#039;t effectively take it to the people, it&#039;s no different than a 90&#039;s PowerPoint presentation available to the masses.   

I think businesses still expect the magic &#039;if you build it, they will come&#039; from Field of Dreams to happen in reality.  This is not the case and we can all learn from Mark&#039;s comments regading the importance meaningful engagement at the local level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx for calling this to my attention.  </p>
<p>No different that the 90&#8242;s, when you could be anything in PowerPoint, today, you can be anything in a Web Site (community site or otherwise).   However, if you can&#8217;t effectively take it to the people, it&#8217;s no different than a 90&#8242;s PowerPoint presentation available to the masses.   </p>
<p>I think businesses still expect the magic &#8216;if you build it, they will come&#8217; from Field of Dreams to happen in reality.  This is not the case and we can all learn from Mark&#8217;s comments regading the importance meaningful engagement at the local level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

